8 minute read

Striped Bass are New England’s most targeted gamefish. They are a keystone species in the region’s marine ecosystem and are major contributors to the recreational fishing economy. However, overfishing, habitat destruction, and the growing impacts of climate change have taken their toll on striped bass populations. Managing Striped Bass has become a complicated issue, with conservationists calling for stricter regulations while the fishing community pushes for uninterrupted access to the fishery.

As a seasoned recreational fisherman, my fellow anglers have witnessed firsthand the changes that the Striped Bass population has undergone. This perspective gives a unique insight into the opinions of recreational fishermen and how the recreational industry interacts with government management. 

Balancing preservation, maintaining the wants of recreational anglers, and supporting the economy requires a science-driven and stakeholder-informed adaptive management strategy.

Why Striped Bass Matter

Striped Bass play an important role in coastal ecosystems. They help regulate the populations of smaller fish like menhaden, herring, and squid while also serving as prey for predators such as sharks and seals. Besides their ecological significance, they’re the backbone of a booming recreational and commercial fishing industry. Thousands of anglers flood the Atlantic coast every year during the spring and fall months to target Striped Bass. This results in millions of dollars being pumped into local businesses such as bait shops, charter boats, hotels, and restaurants.

The Challenges Facing Striped Bass

Striped bass populations have risen and fallen dramatically over the years. The 20th century saw the near collapse of Striped Bass populations as a result of overfishing. A change in management efforts helped the population rebound in the early 2000s, but now, the numbers are dropping again. Anglers who remember that dark age of the fishery have stated their fears of repeating the stock collapse of the 1980s.

There are many anglers who remember the state of the Striped Bass population during the 80s and early 2000s. Some of these anglers compared the current population to the numbers from back then. They argue that Striped Bass used to be scarce and that recent population growth indicates overpopulation. This opinion only justifies malpractice and overharvesting. It boldens not only the need for education and awareness among fishermen but also the need for stricter rules, specifically for recreational anglers.

Habitat loss is also a growing problem. Striped Bass depend on healthy estuaries and coastal waters for spawning and nursery grounds. These areas are under threat from pollution, coastal development, and habitat destruction. The loss of habitats like salt marshes and eelgrass beds makes it harder for young fish to survive. On top of that, climate change is shifting ocean temperatures and altering migration patterns, which adds even more uncertainty to the species’ future. Stories about Canadian fishermen culling Striped Bass and the low spawning rates in the Chesapeake Bay are becoming frequent.

From my experience fishing the coastal waters of Connecticut and Rhode Island, I have noticed changes in migration patterns and behaviors. Fellow anglers have told me they have noticed the same trends. The western Long Island sound used to get a great push of adult Menhaden with large Bass on their tails. In the last couple of years, this Menhaden buffet has occurred all over the migratory corridor except for the western Long Island Sound. This is a solid indicator of a change in food abundance and potential habitat loss. Fishery management focuses on measures that will directly decrease the mortality rate. However, anglers are noticing the negative impacts of pollution, coastal development, and habitat destruction. Many anglers agree that stronger measures should be taken to preserve essential habitats.

How Striped Bass Are Managed

Regulators have implemented several strategies to keep the fishery sustainable while allowing fishing to continue. There are five main strategies currently in use. The first is catch limits that restrict anglers to a set number of fish per day. Catch limits are an effective way to prevent overfishing. The second strategy is gear restrictions. Certain fishing methods, such as gillnets, are banned or heavily regulated to reduce bycatch and damage to the ecosystem. The third strategy is seasonal closures. Fishing is restricted during spawning season to give the fish a better chance at reproducing. The fourth strategy is slot limits. The slot limit grants the take of fish within a specific size range (e.g., 28 to 35 inches). By protecting the older and younger year classes, the slot limit ensures that juveniles reach reproductive maturity and protects fish that have reached the reproductive stage. The final of the big five is the circle hook rule. Many states now require circle hooks when fishing with bait. Circle hooks minimize the chance of hooking a fish in a way that increases mortality. Fish are less likely to swallow (become gut hooked) a circle hook as opposed to other traditional bait hooks like the J Hook.

These rules are designed to maintain a healthy striped bass population. But their success depends on enforcement and whether anglers follow them. Any die-hard angler will tell you that they respect these rules but will also provide numerous accounts of people they have witnessed breaking them. Lack of enforcement allows wrongdoers to poach, over-limit, and blatantly ignore the rules. Conservation groups and some anglers have voiced opinions about stricter regulations to prevent rule-breaking and population decline. However, these views can conflict with the rest of the fishing community.

Why Adaptive Management Is Key

Fisheries management isn’t a “one solution solves all” problem. It requires constant adjustments based on new data and changing environmental conditions. Constant adjustment to new data and ecological conditions is what makes an adaptive approach so important. Climate change has complicated the management process. As migration patterns shift with warmer water, areas may start to see fewer fish while new areas experience an influx of Striped Bass. The availability and distribution of prey species are also influenced by changing water temperatures. Failure to adapt to these shifts will result in the management of areas that no longer require it and a lack of management in new areas that have become increasingly important to Striped Bass. The goal is to rebuild a steadily declining Striped Bass population. The best way to achieve this goal is to utilize adaptive management strategies to ensure that all management bases are covered.

The Conflict Between Conservation and Fishing Access

Not everyone agrees on how striped Bass should be managed. Conservation groups and conservation-oriented anglers argue that even stricter regulations are necessary to protect a currently declining population. These groups lean on spawning rates and population data as evidence that mortality rates are still too high. They argue that this is evidence that we need stricter restrictions, like lower catch limits and extended closures. These views are not wrong, but they do not present any new strategies to management. Many anglers and fishing businesses feel that current regulations are already tough enough. Tighter restrictions could mean lost income for charter boat captains, bait shop owners, and others who rely on Striped Bass. They argue that environmental changes and commercial fishing pressures are the real danger. Again, these opinions are not wrong, but finding that balance between economy and conservation is the key to ensuring a sustainable Striped Bass population.

The Path Forward

Walking the fine line between effective management and ensuring a productive fishing industry is the delicate game being played by government officials. Striped Bass aren’t just a recreational target. They’re an essential part of the marine ecosystem and a major economic driver for coastal communities. Science and stakeholder input should be at the forefront of management regulations and policies. Combining science with local and traditional ecological knowledge will enhance protection and conserve the needs and realities of the fishing industry.

Striped bass management could serve as a model for handling other species experiencing similar challenges. In an era of rapid environmental change, other species around the world are guaranteed to face the same dilemma as Striped Bass. By staying flexible and making decisions based on the best available science, we can ensure that Striped Bass remain a staple of New England’s waters for generations.